Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499184›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

A Subdural Bioelectronic Implant to Record Electrical Activity from the Spinal Cord in Freely Moving Rats.

Bruce Harland, Zaid Aqrawe, Maria Vomero, Christian Boehler, Ernest Cheah, Brad Raos, Maria Asplund, Simon J O'Carroll, Darren Svirskis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruce HarlandSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Zaid AqraweSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Maria VomeroDepartment of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Christian BoehlerDepartment of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Ernest CheahSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Brad RaosSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Maria AsplundDepartment of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), BrainLinks-BrainTools Center and Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Simon J O'CarrollDepartment of Anatomy & Medical Imaging, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Darren SvirskisSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9435-1773
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Investigating the molecular, cellular and circuit effects of transcranial magnetic stimulationR01NS109498 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FALCHIER, ARNAUD Y, OPITZ, ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2022
$3.2M
CatWalk Spinal Cord Injury TrustEuropean Research Council European Union's Horizon 2020 759655Federal Ministry of Economics, Science and Arts of Baden-WürttembergFreiburg Institute for Advanced StudiesGerman Research Foundation EXC 1086Health Research Council of New Zealand 19/007Health Research Council of New Zealand 19/895National Institute of Health R01NS109498Neurological Foundation of New Zealand 1941 PGNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioelectronic devices have found use at the interface with neural tissue to investigate and treat nervous system disorders. Here, the development and characterization of a very thin flexible bioelectronic implant inserted along the thoracic spinal cord in rats directly in contact with and conformable to the dorsal surface of the spinal cord are presented. There is no negative impact on hind-limb functionality nor any change in the volume or shape of the spinal cord. The bioelectronic implant is maintained in rats for a period of 12 weeks. The first subdural recordings of spinal cord activity in freely moving animals are presented; rats are plugged in via a recording cable and allowed to freely behave and move around on a raised platform. Recordings contained multiple distinct voltage waveforms spatially localize to individual electrodes. This device has great potential to monitor electrical signaling in the spinal cord after an injury and in the future, this implant will facilitate the identification of biomarkers in spinal cord injury and recovery, while enabling the delivery of localized electroceutical and chemical treatments.

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsProstheses and ImplantsRatsSubdural Spacebioelectronic implantelectroceuticalpolyimidespinal cord implantspinal cord injuryspinal recording

Identifiers

PMID35499184
PMCPMC9284137
OpenAlexW4225271255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.