ArticleSports health
New or Recurrent Knee Injury, Physical Activity, and Osteoarthritis Beliefs in a Cohort of Female Athletes 2 to 3 Years After ACL Reconstruction and Matched Healthy Peers.
Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Psychosocial Factors in Returning to Physical Activity and Sport Among Female Football Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Relationship between Changes in Physical Activity and Knee Health 18 Months after ACL Reconstruction.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2025Article
- Sports Injuries in Female and Non-Binary Athletes: A Systematic Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Midlife health crisis of former competitive athletes: dissecting their experiences via qualitative study.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- Monitoring External Workload With Wearable Technology After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Osteoarthritis as an Umbrella Term for Different Subsets of Humans Undergoing Joint Degeneration: The Need to Address the Differences to Develop Effective Conservative Treatments and Prevention Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt 2 to 3 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), the relationship between known modifiable osteoarthritis (OA) risk factors and recurrent knee injury is unknown. This study aimed to determine the odds of new or recurrent traumatic knee injury in a cohort of young female athletes with ACLR 2 to 3 years postsurgery compared with healthy control participants. Secondary objectives were to explore the relationships of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and body mass index (BMI) with knee injury, and to document self-reported MVPA satisfaction and beliefs about OA. STUDY
designProspective cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
methodsA total of 51 female athletes with unilateral ACLR 1 to 2 years previously and 51 age and sport-matched control participants underwent assessment of MVPA (GT3X accelerometers) and BMI. One year later, participants self-reported knee injuries. Bivariable conditional logistic regression explored the association between knee injury, MVPA, and BMI in each group (injury/control).
resultsAt 1-year follow-up (n = 101), 19.6% of the injured cohort and 6.0% of control participants sustained a new or recurrent knee injury. The odds of knee injury for the injury group increased 7-fold over controls [odds ratio (OR) = 7.00 (95% CI = 0.86, 56.90)], although this was not statistically significant. The OR for MVPA was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.93, 1.03) and BMI was OR = 1.24 (95% CI = 0.85, 1.82). Half (56.0%) of injury participants and 66% of controls were satisfied with their MVPA; 81.6% of injury participants believed they had increased knee OA risk compared with someone who had never had a knee injury.
conclusionIn the 2 to 3 years after ACLR, 1 in 5 young female athletes had a new or recurrent knee injury. Based on the point estimate, injured participants were more likely to suffer a traumatic knee injury than matched control participants. MVPA and BMI were not associated with increased odds of knee injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be encouraged to have in-depth conversations with female athletes with previous ACLR regarding enjoyable and sustainable MVPA participation to promote long-term joint health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.