ArticleSN social sciences2022
Blended practical learning in compliance with COVID-19 social distancing.
Article in SN social sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Enhancing Professionalism Online (Netiquette) in Medical Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has imposed great changes in everyday life. Starting from January 2020, Humanitas University proposed to students digital instruction for continuing medical education, in particular, concerning practical activities. The latter, defined as Professionalizing activities, were transformed into complete online learning. From September 2020, in accordance to the imposed rules of social distancing, we modified the approach to Professionalizing activities. Despite following the new constrains, we came up with a blend online and face-to-face education program. The Kirkpatrick's evaluation model has been followed for validation of the project. Two ad hoc satisfaction questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate the project. Different approaches to blended learning have been described in literature; however, we propose a new method application, which fits to the post-pandemic era, with the purpose of sharing our experience in the field. Advantages and limitations are described. According to students, the overall satisfaction was rated 6.8, while tutors evaluated it with 7.4. The qualitative analysis of data confirms the advantage of the blended learning activities in order to guarantee a continuation of the clinical curriculum. Although it highlighted the necessity for, an increased technical support and an improvement in organization of the meetings. Blended learning is becoming more accepted among academic communities because it combines "the best of both worlds." However, its effectiveness depends on several factors. With our approach, we propose a method, specifically designed to make effective this kind of teaching, which can be considered essential in the pandemic era we are facing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.