Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499065›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Implementation and evaluation of Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in mandated forensic psychiatric care - Study protocol for a multicenter cluster randomized trial.

Peter Andersson, Malin Tistad, Åsa Eriksson, Pia Enebrink, Knut Sturidsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04695132 (Illness Management and Recovery- en behandlingsutvärdering Inom rättspsykiatrin.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04695132 naunknown statusnot on this map

Illness Management and Recovery- en behandlingsutvärdering Inom rättspsykiatrin.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2021 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsPsychotic Disorders, Forensic Psychology, Forensic Nursing, Antisocial Personality DisorderArmsIllness Management and Recovery treatment programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter AnderssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Malin TistadSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 791 88, Falun, Sweden.
Åsa ErikssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia EnebrinkDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Knut SturidssonDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEDalarna University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Forensic mental health care is hampered by lack of evidence-based treatments. The Swedish forensic mental health population consists of patients suffering from severe illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorders, similar to populations in international studies. Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is an intervention for patients with serious mental illness, based on psychoeducational, cognitive-behavioral and motivational components. The purpose is to strengthen participants' illness management skills and recovery. Objective: To test effectiveness of IMR within forensic mental health by comparing it to treatment as usual. Method: This is a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patients in forensic mental health inpatient units are randomized to an active (IMR) or a control condition (treatment as usual). Clustering of patients is based on ward-units where inpatients are admitted. Patients in the active condition receive two group and one individual IMR sessions per week. The treatment phase is estimated to last nine months. Outcomes include illness related disability, illness management skills, sense of recovery, hope, mental health and security related problems. Outcomes are measured at baseline, four months into treatment, at treatment completion and at three months follow-up. Staff experiences of implementing IMR will be explored by a self-report measure and semi-structured interview based on Normalization Process Theory. Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Registration No. 2020-02046). Participation will be voluntary based on written informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed articles and conferences. The study is registered in the US registry of clinical trials (NCT04695132).

Indexed as

Forensic mental healthIllness management and recoveryOffender rehabilitationSchizophrenia spectrum disorder

Identifiers

PMID35499065
PMCPMC9038540
OpenAlexW4220675466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.