Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498978›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2022

Non-conventional techniques for the extraction of antioxidant compounds and lycopene from industrial tomato pomace (

Paulo Sergio Nunes Chada, Pedro Henrique Santos, Luiz Gustavo Gonçalves Rodrigues, Gilberto Alessandre Soares Goulart, Jonatas Dias Azevedo Dos Santos, Marcelo Maraschin, Marcelo Lanza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Sergio Nunes ChadaDepartment of Chemical and Food Engineering (EQA), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), P.O. Box 476, Postal code: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique SantosDepartment of Chemical and Food Engineering (EQA), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), P.O. Box 476, Postal code: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Luiz Gustavo Gonçalves RodriguesDepartment of Chemical and Food Engineering (EQA), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), P.O. Box 476, Postal code: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Gilberto Alessandre Soares GoulartSchool of Agronomy, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Postal code: 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Jonatas Dias Azevedo Dos SantosSchool of Agronomy, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Postal code: 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Marcelo MaraschinDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), P.O. Box 476, Postal code: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Marcelo LanzaDepartment of Chemical and Food Engineering (EQA), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), P.O. Box 476, Postal code: 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to use the non-conventional microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) techniques for recovering bioactive compounds from tomato pomace, a valuable agro-industrial waste. The raw material was previously dried using a spouted bed dryer and then submitted to extraction with green solvents. A response surface methodology (RSM) performed the optimization of MAE and PLE. Next, the yield and the antioxidant activity results were maximized, and the lycopene content of the optimum MAE and PLE extracts was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Additionally, a fraction of raw material was oven dried as a comparison. The PLE extract exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, whereas the MAE extract showed the highest lycopene content (59.66 µg lycopene/g extract), which represents a 66.93% lycopene recovery compared to a standard technique with acetone. The remarkable results show that the non-conventional drying and extraction techniques were effective in valorizing this neglected material.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsLycopeneMicrowave-assisted extractionPressurized liquid extractionSpouted bed dryer

Identifiers

PMID35498978
PMCPMC9040000
OpenAlexW4210645599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.