Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498766›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2021

Renal replacement therapy in intensive care units in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

D L Skinner, K de Vasconcellos, R Wise, T Kisten, M Faurie, T Hardcastle, D J J Muckart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D L SkinnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
K de VasconcellosDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
R WiseDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
T KistenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
M FaurieDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
T HardcastleDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
D J J MuckartDepartment of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a scarce resource in southern Africa. Critically ill patients are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI), which may require RRT. There are few data on the utilisation of RRT in southern African intensive care units (ICUs). Objectives: To determine the indications for initiating RRT in critically ill patients in ICUs in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (SA) and to describe the methods and dosing of RRT. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed to investigate the indications for initiating, methods and dosing of RRT among patients admitted to four ICUs in KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA. All adult patients were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 108 patients who received RRT were included in the study. The most common reasons for initiation of RRT were a high/rising creatinine, high/rising urea, acidosis and fluid balance. The majority of the patients (79.6%; Conclusion: Patients in this study had multiple indications for initiating RRT. The dosing of RRT was not optimal, with a wide range shown in CRRT, and the majority of patients did not achieve a urea reduction ratio (URR) >65%. Contributions of the study: Renal replacement therapy is a scarce resource in Africa. Little is known about the current types and dosing of RRT in critical care units in South Africa. We showed that critically ill patients had multiple indications for RRT and the dosing was not optimal.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryblood purificationcritical caredialysisrenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID35498766
PMCPMC9045502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.