Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

An Approach Using Emerging Optical Technologies and Artificial Intelligence Brings New Markers to Evaluate Peanut Seed Quality.

Gustavo Roberto Fonseca de Oliveira, Clíssia Barboza Mastrangelo, Welinton Yoshio Hirai, Thiago Barbosa Batista, Julia Marconato Sudki, Ana Carolina Picinini Petronilio, Carlos Alexandre Costa Crusciol, Edvaldo Aparecido Amaral da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcripts Expressed during GerminationPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gustavo Roberto Fonseca de OliveiraDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Clíssia Barboza MastrangeloLaboratory of Radiobiology and Environment, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Welinton Yoshio HiraiDepartment of Exacts Sciences, College of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz", University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Thiago Barbosa BatistaDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Julia Marconato SudkiLaboratory of Radiobiology and Environment, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Picinini PetronilioDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Carlos Alexandre Costa CrusciolDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Edvaldo Aparecido Amaral da SilvaDepartment of Crop Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seeds of high physiological quality are defined by their superior germination capacity and uniform seedling establishment. Here, it was investigated whether multispectral images combined with machine learning models can efficiently categorize the quality of peanut seedlots. The seed quality from seven lots was assessed traditionally (seed weight, water content, germination, and vigor) and by multispectral images (area, length, width, brightness, chlorophyll fluorescence, anthocyanin, and reflectance: 365 to 970 nm). Seedlings from the seeds of each lot were evaluated for their photosynthetic capacity (fluorescence and chlorophyll index, F

Indexed as

Arachis hypogaea L.fluorescenceimagesmachine-learningmultispectralreflectanceseed quality

Identifiers

PMID35498679
PMCPMC9048030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.