ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Plant Species Classification Based on Hyperspectral Imaging
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel attention based vision transformer optimized with hybrid optimization algorithm for turmeric leaf disease detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automatic fused multimodal deep learning for plant identification.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Advancing hyperspectral imaging techniques for root systems: a new pipeline for macro- and microscale image acquisition and classification.Plant methods · 2024Article
- An improved deep learning network for image detection and its application in Dendrobii caulis decoction piece.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phenolic content discrimination in Thai holy basil using hyperspectral data analysis and machine learning techniques.PloS one · 2024Article
- Image-based classification of wheat spikes by glume pubescence using convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, many image-based approaches have been proposed to classify plant species. Most methods utilized red green blue (RGB) imaging materials and designed custom features to classify the plant images using machine learning algorithms. Those works primarily focused on analyzing single-leaf images instead of live-crown images. Without considering the additional features of the leaves' color and spatial pattern, they failed to handle cases that contained leaves similar in appearance due to the limited spectral information of RGB imaging. To tackle this dilemma, this study proposes a novel framework that combines hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and deep learning techniques for plant image classification. We built a plant image dataset containing 1,500 images of 30 different plant species taken by a 470-900 nm hyperspectral camera and designed a lightweight conventional neural network (CNN) model (LtCNN) to perform image classification. Several state-of-art CNN classifiers are chosen for comparison. The impact of using different band combinations as the network input is also investigated. Results show that using simulated RGB images achieves a kappa coefficient of nearly 0.90 while using the combination of 3-band RGB and 3-band near-infrared images can improve to 0.95. It is also found that the proposed LtCNN can obtain a satisfactory performance of plant classification (kappa = 0.95) using critical spectral features of the green edge (591 nm), red-edge (682 nm), and near-infrared (762 nm) bands. This study also demonstrates the excellent adaptability of the LtCNN model in recognizing leaf features of plant live-crown images while using a relatively smaller number of training samples than complex CNN models such as AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and VGGNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.