Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Comparative Analysis of Anthocyanin Compositions and Starch Physiochemical Properties of Purple-Fleshed Sweetpotato "Xuzishu8" in Desert Regions of China.

Hui Yan, Yungang Zhang, Muhammad Qadir Ahmad, Yaju Liu, Meng Kou, Meng Ma, Chen Li, Mohamed Hamed Arisha, Wei Tang, Xin Wang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hui YanXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Yungang ZhangXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Muhammad Qadir AhmadDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Yaju LiuXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Meng KouXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Meng MaXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Chen LiInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomics, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.
Mohamed Hamed ArishaDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Wei TangXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Xin WangXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Runfei GaoXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Weihan SongXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Zongyun LiInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomics, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China.
Qiang LiXuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, China.
Sweet Potato Research Institute · CNJiangsu Normal University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNBahauddin Zakariya University · PKZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to determine the scope of sweetpotato cultivation in arid regions of China. For this purpose, we investigated yield, anthocyanin compositions and physicochemical properties of starch in purple-fleshed sweetpotato (PFSP) "Xuzishu8" under humid (zi8-X) and arid (zi8-D) environments of China. The experiment was conducted in three replications in both environments during 2019 and 2020. The yield and anthocyanidins contents of PFSP were significantly higher in the arid conditions as compared to humid. Zi8-X and zi8-D both revealed the presence of three anthocyanidins, namely, cyanidin (Cy), peonidin (Pn), and pelargonidin (Pg). Cy and Pn accounted for 36.40 and 63.54% of the total anthocyanidins in zi8-X, while in zi8-D, they were found as 26.13 and 73.80%, respectively. The quantitative analysis of these anthocyanins was performed using HPLC-ESI-MS/MS which revealed eighteen anthocyanins such as nine Cy, eight Pn and one Pg. Out of which, eleven anthocyanins showed a significant difference under both conditions. Starch and amylopectin contents were found to be increased by 15.39 and 4.71%, respectively, while the amylose concentration was reduced by 15.54% under the arid environment. The diameter of the starch granule and the peak viscosity were significantly higher under arid as compared to humid conditions. On the basis of results of this study, it seems quite practicable to develop PFSP cultivation in desert regions.

Indexed as

anthocyanidinsanthocyanin compositionsarid environmentPFSPstarch physicochemical properties

Identifiers

PMID35498654
PMCPMC9039657
OpenAlexW4223578865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.