ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2022
Association Between Change in Nonexercise Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Men.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-exercise estimation of peak oxygen uptake in patients with ischaemic heart disease and heart failure using seismocardiography.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Accuracy of a non-exercise method using seismocardiography for the estimation of V̇OEuropean journal of sport science · 2024Article
- Criterion Validity and Responsiveness of Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness Models in Patients with Inflammatory Joint Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of seismocardiography for the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2023Article
- Initial Assessment of a Brief Health, Fitness, and Spirituality Survey for Epidemiological Research: A Pilot Study.Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between change in nonexercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) and mortality risk in adult men. Patients and Methods: A total of 10,445 men (mean age, 44.6±9.3 years) from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study underwent 2 comprehensive medical examinations and peak work rate tests between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 2002, with an average time between measures of 5.7±4.9 years. Participants were observed for 11.6±6.4 years after their second examination until death or December 31, 2003. The eCRF was calculated with the Jackson et al (2012) and Nes et al (2011) published nonexercise estimation equations. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to examine the association between change in eCRF and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Results: There were 601 deaths (192 CVD deaths) during the follow-up period. For both eCRF equations, a higher eCRF at baseline was associated with significant reductions in mortality risk from all causes and CVD ( Conclusion: The association between change in nonexercise eCRF and mortality risk may be equation dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.