Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498251›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2020

Open-source autosampler for elemental and isotopic analyses of solids.

Matheus C Carvalho, William Eickhoff, Michael Drexl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matheus C CarvalhoCentre for Coastal Biogeochemistry Research. School of Environment, Science and Engineering. Southern Cross University. PO Box 157, Lismore 2480, NSW, Australia.
William EickhoffSouthern Cross Plant Science. Southern Cross University. PO Box 157, Lismore 2480, NSW, Australia.
Michael DrexlSouthern Cross Geoscience. Southern Cross University. PO Box 157, Lismore 2480, NSW, Australia.
Southern Cross University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elemental and isotopic analyses are performed using elemental analyzers, and are widely employed for diverse scientific fields. An elemental analyzer is typically equipped with an autosampler. Here we present an open-source autosampler for elemental and isotopic analysis of solid samples. The autosampler consists of 1) a sampling table, on which a carousel pushes samples inside an orifice, and 2) a purging pipe, placed directly beneath the orifice, where the sample is purged off surrounding air, and then delivered to the reaction tube. The action of the purging pipe ensured that air contamination, an issue for the analysis of some elements like nitrogen and oxygen, was negligible, and results for elemental and isotopic composition of nitrogen and carbon were inside specs. Compared to commercial alternatives, the autosampler presented here has the advantages of lower cost to build and maintain, universal compatibility with instruments from different manufacturers, capacity do deal with bulky samples, capacity for a larger number of samples in a single run, and no necessity for time-consuming purging in-between sample loading. The autosampler could potentially also be employed for the analyses of other elements (e.g. oxygen, hydrogen and sulfur) because they are performed using similar equipment.

Indexed as

3D printingArduinoAutoItAutosamplerCarbonElemental analysisLaboratory automationNitrogenOpenSCADSamplingStable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID35498251
PMCPMC9041227
OpenAlexW3041402217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.