Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498195›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Smart Healthcare System with Light-Weighted Blockchain System and Deep Learning Techniques.

Randeep Singh, Bilal Ahmed Mir, Lohith J J, Dhruva Sreenivasa Chakravarthi, Adel R Alharbi, Harish Kumar, Simon Karanja Hingaa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Randeep SinghDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, IEC University, Baddi, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Bilal Ahmed MirDepartment of Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, University of Toyama, Japan.
Lohith J JDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B M S College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.
Dhruva Sreenivasa ChakravarthiKL Business School, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University (KLEF), Vaddeswaram, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Adel R AlharbiCollege of Computing and Information Technology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Harish KumarDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2302-5828
Simon Karanja HingaaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-3525
IEC University · INKing Khalid University · SAKoneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation · INTechnical University of Mombasa · KEUniversity B.D.T College of Engineering · INUniversity of Tabuk · SAUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A radio communication sensor system is a collection of sensor modules that are connected to one another through wireless communication. It is common for them to be battery-powered and responsive to a nearby controller, referred to as the base station. They are capable of doing basic computations and transferring information to the base station in most scenarios. They are also in charge of transporting data from distant nodes, putting a burden on nodes with limited resources, and contributing to the quick depletion of energy in these nodes in the process. Nodes in close proximity to the base station are responsible for more than only detecting and sending data to the base station; they are also responsible for transmitting data from faraway nodes. To reward nodes that perform well, a protocol known as the Improved Fuzzy Inspired Energy Effective Protocol (IFIEEP) employs three separate sorts of nodes in order to provide more energy to those who do not. It takes into account the remaining node energy, the node's proximity to the base station, the node's neighbor concentration, and the node's centrality in a cluster when determining node viability. All of these assumptions are founded on a shaky understanding of the situation. Adaptive clustering must be applied to the most viable nodes in order to identify cluster leaders and transmit data to the base station, in addition to disseminating data across the rest of the network, in order to achieve success. In addition, the research provides proper heterogeneity parameters, which describe, among other things, the number of nodes as well as the starting energy of each node. The percentage gain in-network lifetime when compared to current approaches is minor for smaller numbers of supernodes; however, the percentage gain in the area covered 12.89 percent and 100% when more significant numbers of super nodes are used. These improvements in stability, residual energy, and throughput are accomplished by combining these improvements while also taking into consideration the previously neglected energy-intensive sensing energy aspect. The protocol that has been presented is meant to be used in conjunction with applications that make use of blockchain technology.

Indexed as

BlockchainDeep LearningCommunicationDelivery of Health CareTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35498195
PMCPMC9042613
OpenAlexW4224243854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.