ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Online Course Model of Social and Political Education Using Deep Learning.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Online Course Model of Social and Political Education Using Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-14Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/423EA9E84C94991468B88CFD5A730C
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to improve the social and political literacy of college students. Social and Political Education (SPE) is studied for undergraduates. Firstly, the background of the subject research is introduced. The face recognition module is built based on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). The sociopolitical situation of the study subjects is analyzed through a questionnaire. Secondly, a model of the learning process is constructed. Finally, the SPE online course learning platform is constructed. Empirical studies are divided into experimental and control groups. The findings show that all model assumptions are valid. There is a significant structural relationship between the influencing factors of the SPE learning process of college students in the study area. The students selected as research objects lack innovation and critical thinking in the learning process and have certain deficiencies in innovative thinking and critical thinking. The questionnaire has good reliability and validity. The predicted data of the designed platform are compared with the predicted data of the control group. Social science competencies by gender are compared. The results showed little difference in the effectiveness of students using other methods for sociopolitical learning. The data of the experimental group before and after the test are quite different, indicating that the designed experimental platform has played a certain positive role. There are significant differences in the posttest data between the experimental group and the control group, indicating that the constructed online course learning model has a positive impact on students' innovative thinking and critical thinking. Women's learning motivation and transfer learning ability are stronger than those of men. The constructed model has certain feasibility for the learning of SPE online courses with face recognition module. These contents provide a reference for the reform of social and political courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.