ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds-Insights From an All-Comer Registry.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06075602 (COMPLEX Registry - a Prospective COhort Study to Describe the Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting with CompLEX and Calcified Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COMPLEX Registry - a Prospective COhort Study to Describe the Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting with CompLEX and Calcified Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medium-to-long term outcomes of bioresorbable scaffold treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome.World journal of cardiology · 2025Trial
- A Comparison of Performance of the Different Generations of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Coronary Stents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- DynamX Bioadaptor as an Emerging and Promising Innovation in Interventional Cardiology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Safety and Efficacy Profile of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Coronary Stents as Compared to Poly-L-Lactic Acid-Based Bioresorbable and Contemporary Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents-A Systematic Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Very late Magmaris scaffold restenosis: a 6-year serial optical coherence tomography case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Two-Year Outcomes for Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Magmaris and Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Large-Vessel Lesions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Insights into the biocompatibility of biodegradable metallic molybdenum for cardiovascular applications-a critical review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Development and Future Trends of Protective Strategies for Magnesium Alloy Vascular Stents.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioresorbable Magnesium-Based Stent: Real-World Clinical Experience and Feasibility of Follow-Up by Coronary Computed Tomography: A New Window to Look at New Scaffolds.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Metal free percutaneous coronary interventions in all-comers: First experience with a novel sirolimus-coated balloon.Cardiology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The magnesium-based sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (Mg-BRS) Magmaris™ showed promising clinical outcomes, including low rates of both the target lesion failure (TLF) and scaffold thrombosis (ScT), in selected study patients. However, insights regarding long-term outcomes (>2 years) in all-comer populations remain scarce. Methods: We analyzed data from a single-center registry, including patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Mg-BRS. The primary outcome comprised the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) representing a hierarchical composite of cardiac death, ScT, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) up to 5 years. Results: In total, 84 patients [mean age 62 ± 11 years and 63 (75%) men] were treated with the Mg-BRS devices between June 2016 and March 2017. Overall, 101 lesions had successfully been treated with the Mg-BRS devices using 1.2 ± 0.4 devices per lesion. Pre- and postdilatation using dedicated devices had been performed in 101 (100%) and 98 (97%) of all the cases, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 62 (61-64) months, 14 (18%) patients had experienced DoCEs, whereas ScT was encountered in 4 (4.9%) patients [early ScTs (<30 days) in three cases and two fatal cases]. In 4 (29%) of DoCE cases, optical coherence tomography confirmed the Mg-BRS collapse and uncontrolled dismantling. Conclusion: In contradiction to earlier studies, we encountered a relatively high rate of DoCEs in an all-comer cohort treated with the Mg-BRS. We even observed scaffold collapse and uncontrolled dismantling. This implicates that this metal-based BRS requires further investigation and may only be used in highly selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.