Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35498038›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Automatic Identification of Patients With Unexplained Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Electronic Health Record Data to Improve Targeted Treatment and Family Screening.

Arjan Sammani, Mark Jansen, Nynke M de Vries, Nicolaas de Jonge, Annette F Baas, Anneline S J M Te Riele, Folkert W Asselbergs, Marish I F J Oerlemans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Deep learning for electrocardiogram interpretation: Bench to bedside.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arjan SammaniDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mark JansenDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nynke M de VriesDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nicolaas de JongeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Annette F BaasDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anneline S J M Te RieleDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marish I F J OerlemansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unexplained Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ULVH) may be caused by genetic and non-genetic etiologies (e.g., sarcomere variants, cardiac amyloid, or Anderson-Fabry's disease). Identification of ULVH patients allows for early targeted treatment and family screening. Aim: To automatically identify patients with ULVH in electronic health record (EHR) data using two computer methods: text-mining and machine learning (ML). Methods: Adults with echocardiographic measurement of interventricular septum thickness (IVSt) were included. A text-mining algorithm was developed to identify patients with ULVH. An ML algorithm including a variety of clinical, ECG and echocardiographic data was trained and tested in an 80/20% split. Clinical diagnosis of ULVH was considered the gold standard. Misclassifications were reviewed by an experienced cardiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios (LHR+ and LHR-) of both text-mining and ML were reported. Results: In total, 26,954 subjects (median age 61 years, 55% male) were included. ULVH was diagnosed in 204/26,954 (0.8%) patients, of which 56 had amyloidosis and two Anderson-Fabry Disease. Text-mining flagged 8,192 patients with possible ULVH, of whom 159 were true positives (sensitivity, specificity, LHR+, and LHR- of 0.78, 0.67, 2.36, and 0.33). Machine learning resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, LHR+, and LHR- of 0.32, 0.99, 32, and 0.68, respectively. Pivotal variables included IVSt, systolic blood pressure, and age. Conclusions: Automatic identification of patients with ULVH is possible with both Text-mining and ML. Text-mining may be a comprehensive scaffold but can be less specific than machine learning. Deployment of either method depends on existing infrastructures and clinical applications.

Indexed as

anderson-fabry diseasecardiac amyloidosiselectronic health recordleft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)text-mining

Identifiers

PMID35498038
PMCPMC9051030
OpenAlexW4223969611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.