Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497988›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation and Telehealth: Rationale for Future Integration in Supportive Care of Cancer Survivors.

Ladislav Batalik, Katerina Filakova, Ivana Radkovcova, Filip Dosbaba, Petr Winnige, Daniela Vlazna, Katerina Batalikova, Marian Felsoci, Marios Stefanakis, David Liska and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06828003 (A Remotely-Delivered Resistance Training Program for Cognitive Function in Men Living With and Beyond Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06828003 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Remotely-Delivered Resistance Training Program for Cognitive Function in Men Living With and Beyond Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsProstate Cancer, Resistance TrainingArmsResistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Integrated Cardio-oncology Service.Cardiac failure review · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ladislav BatalikDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Katerina FilakovaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Ivana RadkovcovaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Filip DosbabaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Petr WinnigeDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Daniela VlaznaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Katerina BatalikovaDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Marian FelsociFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Marios StefanakisPhysiotherapy Department, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
David LiskaFaculty of Arts, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Jannis PapathanasiouDepartment of Medical Imaging, Allergology & Physiotherapy, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Andrea PokornaDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Andrea JanikovaFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Sebastian RutkowskiFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Garyfallia PeperaClinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZMatej Bel University · SKMedical University of Sofia · BGOpole University of Technology · PLUniversity of Thessaly · GRUniversity of West Attica · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct toxicity of cancer treatment threatens patients and survivors with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or adverse functional changes with subsequent progression of cardiovascular complications. An accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors combined with an unhealthy lifestyle has recently become more common in cancer patients and survivors. It has been recommended to integrate a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation model called cardio-oncology rehabilitation to mitigate cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, cardiac rehabilitation interventions limit barriers in low utilization, further exacerbated by the restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is essential to integrate alternative interventions such as telehealth, which can overcome several barriers. This literature review was designed as a framework for developing and evaluating telehealth interventions and mobile applications for comprehensive cardio-oncology rehabilitation. We identify knowledge gaps and propose strategies to facilitate the development and integration of cardio-oncology rehabilitation telehealth as an alternative approach to the standard of care for cancer patients and survivors. Despite the limited evidence, the pilot results from included studies support the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth and mobile technologies in cardio-oncology rehabilitation. This new area suggests that telehealth interventions are feasible and induce physiological and psychological benefits for cancer patients and survivors. There is an assumption that telehealth interventions and exercise may be an effective future alternative approach in supportive cancer care.

Indexed as

cancer survivorscardiac rehabilitationcardio-oncology rehabilitationexercisesupportive cancer caretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35497988
PMCPMC9051023
OpenAlexW4223998786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.