Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497908›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Appropriateness of antifungal prescribing in Oman.

Fatima Issa El-Hussain, Abdullah Balkhair, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatima Issa El-HussainMSc. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. s128706@student.squ.edu.om.
Abdullah BalkhairMD. FRCPc. Senior Consultant, Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. balkhair@squ.edu.om.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6911-5568
Ibrahim Al-ZakwaniPhD. Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. azakwani@squ.edu.om.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-4230
Mohammed Al Za'abiMD. PhD. Professor, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. zaabi@squ.edu.om.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-1022
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital · OMSultan Qaboos University · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The inappropriate use of antimicrobials has substantially contributed to the development of antimicrobial drug resistance. Appropriate antibacterial prescribing has been emphasised, with minimal focus on appropriate prescribing of antifungals. Evaluation of antifungal use in the clinical setting is essential to prevent unnecessary drug exposure, development of resistance, adverse effects, and high hospitalisation costs. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing among adult patients at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Oman. Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, the study population comprised adult patients treated with oral or intravenous antifungals between July 2018 and December 2019. The appropriateness of treatment was assessed using guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), as well as a set of literature-based criteria that were modified by SQUH infectious diseases team to suit local practices. These criteria included indication, dosage, and potential drug interactions. The primary outcome was the frequency of adherence to the treatment guidelines for fungal infections. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 400 prescriptions were collected, of which 158 (39.5%) were for empirical therapy, 135 (33.8%) for targeted therapy, 69 (17.3%) for prophylactic therapy, and 38 (9.5%) for pre-emptive therapy. The overall appropriateness was 74.8%. The indication, dosage, and potential for antifungal-drug interactions were considered appropriate in 391 (97.8%), 314 (78.5%), and 381 (95.3%) prescriptions, respectively. Anidulafungin was the most prescribed antifungal agent, with 210 prescriptions (52.5%), followed by fluconazole with 102 prescriptions (25.5%), and voriconazole with 48 prescriptions (12%). Conclusion: In comparison with publised literature, our study revealed appropriate antifungal drug prescribing practices. However, studies with larger sample size in various hospital settings are necessary to confirm our findings on a national scale, and to obtain better statistical inferences and generalisability.

Indexed as

AnidulafunginAntifungal agentsDrug resistanceFluconazoleGuidelineInappropriate prescribingVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID35497908
PMCPMC9014895
OpenAlexW4223658462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.