Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497899›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Perspectives and experiences with telepharmacy among pharmacists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.

Jamie Y Park, Peter J Zed, Mary A De Vera

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie Y ParkPharm D. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. jamie.park@alumni.ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0696-7434
Peter J ZedBSc., BSc.(Pharm), ACPR, Pharm D, FCSHP. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. peter.zed@ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8809-9206
Mary A De VeraPhD. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Collaboration for Outcomes Research, University of British Columbia, Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mdevera@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-2683
University of British Columbia · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand Canadian pharmacists' use, experiences, and perspectives of telepharmacy. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Individuals were eligible to participate if they were currently a registered, licensed pharmacist practicing in Canada. We collected perspectives of both telepharmacy users and non-users by creating a survey logic that asked specific and shared questions between the two groups. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics including means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Results: Between October and December 2020, 136 pharmacists completed the survey, including 61 (52.6%) telepharmacy users and 55 (47.4%) non-users. Among those who use telepharmacy, the majority of participants (39, 72.2%) expressed that telepharmacy augmented their clinical practice and feel comfortable managing minor ailments using telepharmacy (41, 80.4%). Among non-users, 45 (84.9%) indicated that telepharmacy will augment their clinical practice and 48 (90.6%) would feel comfortable managing minor ailments using telepharmacy. Important considerations for successful implementation of telepharmacy for those who use telepharmacy included easier system implementation (29, 19.3%), better privacy & data protection (28, 18.7%) and simple to learn technology (23, 15.3%). Conclusion: Despite the growing recognition of benefits of telepharmacy, our findings suggest that utilization among pharmacists in Canada is still quite low. Nonetheless, our study identified areas of consideration for better integration of telepharmacy in pharmacy practice including optimizing workflow, addressing barriers, and providing training to pharmacy students.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPharmacyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35497899
PMCPMC9014901
OpenAlexW4223422216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.