Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497843›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

Water structure in solution and crystal molecular dynamics simulations compared to protein crystal structures.

Octav Caldararu, Majda Misini Ignjatović, Esko Oksanen, Ulf Ryde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional protein dynamics in a crystal.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Functional Protein Dynamics in a Crystal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Collagen Structured Hydration.Biomolecules · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring ligand dynamics in protein crystal structures with ensemble refinement.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Octav CaldararuDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre P. O. Box 124 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden Ulf.Ryde@teokem.lu.se +46-46-2228648 +46-46-2224502.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-6568
Majda Misini IgnjatovićDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre P. O. Box 124 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden Ulf.Ryde@teokem.lu.se +46-46-2228648 +46-46-2224502.
Esko OksanenInstruments Division, European Spallation Source Consortium ESS ERIC P. O. Box 176 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden.
Ulf RydeDepartment of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre P. O. Box 124 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden Ulf.Ryde@teokem.lu.se +46-46-2228648 +46-46-2224502.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-8489
Lund University · SEEuropean Spallation Source · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of proteins is influenced not only by the atomic structure but also by the detailed structure of the solvent surrounding it. Computational studies of protein structure also critically depend on the water structure around the protein. Herein we compare the water structure obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of galectin-3 in complex with two ligands to crystallographic water molecules observed in the corresponding crystal structures. We computed MD trajectories both in a water box, which mimics a protein in solution, and in a crystallographic unit cell, which mimics a protein in a crystal. The calculations were compared to crystal structures obtained at both cryogenic and room temperature. Two types of analyses of the MD simulations were performed. First, the positions of the crystallographic water molecules were compared to peaks in the MD density after alignment of the protein in each snapshot. The results of this analysis indicate that all simulations reproduce the crystallographic water structure rather poorly. However, if we define the crystallographic water sites based on their distances to nearby protein atoms and follow these sites throughout the simulations, the MD simulations reproduce the crystallographic water sites much better. This shows that the failure of MD simulations to reproduce the water structure around proteins in crystal structures observed both in this and previous studies is caused by the problem of identifying water sites for a flexible and dynamic protein (traditionally done by overlaying the structures). Our local clustering approach solves the problem and shows that the MD simulations reasonably reproduce the water structure observed in crystals. Furthermore, analysis of the crystal MD simulations indicates a few water molecules that are close to unmodeled electron density peaks in the crystal structures, suggesting that crystal MD could be used as a complementary tool for identifying and modelling water in protein crystallography.

Identifiers

PMID35497843
PMCPMC9049968
OpenAlexW3007619936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.