Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497703›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2022

Opioid-free anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgeries - A prospective non-randomised study in a tertiary care hospital.

Ramanarayanan Ragupathy, S C Ganesh Prabhu, Dhivya Thiyagarajan, Vijay Anto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06202664 (Opioid Free Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Randomized Control Trial at a Tertiary Care Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06202664 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Opioid Free Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Randomized Control Trial at a Tertiary Care Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorMuhammad Haroon AnwarRan2024 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsErector Spinae Block, Opioid Analgesic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Trends in research inIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ramanarayanan RagupathyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
S C Ganesh PrabhuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dhivya ThiyagarajanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vijay AntoDepartment of Community Medicine, Velammal Medical College Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Opioids have nowadays become superfluous because of their adverse effects involving post-operative recovery of the patients. So, we aimed at comparing opioid-free anaesthesia with opioid-based technique for post-operative pain relief in laparoscopic surgeries. The primary objective was to assess the pain scores in the post-operative period using visual analogue scale (VAS) for 24 h, and the secondary objective was to compare intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesics consumed in the first 24 h. Methods: This study was conducted in 60 patients aged between 20 and 70 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I and II posted for laparoscopic surgeries. Anaesthetic doses of lidocaine, magnesium and paracetamol in combination with fascial plane block for post-operative pain relief were given for 30 patients, and the other 30 patients received the conventional opioid-based anaesthesia. Mann-Whitney test was used for VAS scores, and Friedman test was used for repeated measures comparison. Results: VAS scores were higher in the conventional group as compared to the opioid-free group at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h during rest and at 0, 2, 4, 6, 24 h during movement and were statistically significant ( Conclusion: Opioid-free anaesthesia along with erector spinae plane block provides better post-operative pain relief when compared to conventional opioid anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Blockmagnesiumopioidpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID35497703
PMCPMC9053893
OpenAlexW4225296580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.