Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497699›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2022

Estimation of median effective effect-site concentration (EC50) during target-controlled infusion of propofol for dilatation and curettage - A prospective observational study.

Velraj Jaya, P Madhula, Vr Hemanth Kumar, Daniel Rajadurai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Velraj JayaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Karaikal, Puducherry, India.
P MadhulaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Vr Hemanth KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Daniel RajaduraiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Galaxy Hospitals, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute · INJawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Propofol is the drug of choice for sedation in daycare procedures due to its pharmacokinetic properties. Propofol delivery using target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump reduces adverse effects like hypotension and apnoea. In this study, we estimated the median effective effect-site concentration of propofol in patients undergoing dilatation and curettage. Methods: Patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III, aged 40-70 years, undergoing elective dilatation and curettage were recruited for the study. All patients received 1 μg/kg fentanyl and 20 mg lignocaine. The first patient received an effect-site concentration of propofol at 4 μg/mL with TCI Schneider pharmacokinetic model. Failure was defined as patient movement at any time during the procedure. According to the 'BiasedCoin Design' up-and-down sequential method, the response of the previous patient determined the effect-site concentration of propofol of the next patient. The study was terminated once forty patients completed the procedures successfully. Probit analysis was used to determine EC50. Results: Fifty-three patients were recruited for the study. The various effect-site concentrations of propofol EC50, EC90, and EC95 in providing sedation for dilatation and curettage were 3.38 μg/mL, 4.29 μg/mL, and 4.60 μg/mL, respectively. The incidence of hypotension and apnoea were comparable among the various concentrations of propofol. The mean duration of the propofol infusion was 20 ± 2.86 min. The time to recovery from propofol sedation was 6.97 ± 1.76 min. Conclusion: A median effective effect-site concentration of 3.38 μg/mL of propofol is required to prevent patient movement during uterine dilatation and curettage.

Indexed as

Dilatation and curettageinfusion pumpspropofol

Identifiers

PMID35497699
PMCPMC9053899
OpenAlexW4225294439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.