ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2022
Introduction to Cognitive Restructuring for Medical Students.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best Practices for Teaching Psychotherapy to Medical Students: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medical students list stigma and lack of time as reasons to avoid seeking mental health care. Many patients do not receive appropriate mental health care due to a lack of knowledge regarding available treatments among their medical providers. We created this activity to enhance medical student knowledge and well-being by introducing cognitive restructuring principles and skills in a highly interactive module. Methods: We administered a 90-minute learning activity, which included a short videotaped lecture, clinical case vignette, small-group discussion, and application exercise. Immediately following the learning activity, students and faculty completed anonymous evaluations. Results: A total of 139 first-year medical students and 152 second-year medical students completed the activity. For the first-year cohort, upwards of 80% of students and 100% of faculty respondents rated the session either Discussion: The resources included in this module allow educators at any institution to implement this learning activity, as no specific content knowledge/expertise is required of faculty. As the activity was well received by students and faculty, the investment of curricular time appears to have been well spent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.