ArticleRSC advances2020
Carbon electrode engineering for high efficiency all-inorganic perovskite solar cells.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Titanium Carbide (TiMicromachines · 2023Review
- A Review on Interface Engineering of MXenes for Perovskite Solar Cells.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- MXenes Thin Films: From Fabrication to Their Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- 2D MXene: A Potential Candidate for Photovoltaic Cells? A Critical Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- MXene-Based Materials for Solar Cell Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Brief Review of the Role of 2D Mxene Nanosheets toward Solar Cells Efficiency Improvement.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Application of MXenes in Perovskite Solar Cells: A Short Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- MXenes for Solar Cells.Nano-micro letters · 2021Review
- Direct deposition of Sn-doped CsPbBrRSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon-based inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have demonstrated an excellent performance in the field of photovoltaics owing to their simple fabrication techniques, low-cost and superior stability. Despite the lower efficiency of devices with a carbon electrode compared with the conventional structure, the potential applications in large scale have attracted increasing attention. Herein, we employ a mixed carbon electrode inorganic PSC by incorporating one-dimensional structure carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and two-dimensional Ti
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.