ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Comparing the Characteristics of Amniotic Membrane-, Endometrium-, and Urinary-Derived ECMs and Their Effects on Endometrial Regeneration in a Rat Uterine Injury Model.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Trends in Tissue Engineering Strategies for Uterine Endometrial Regeneration: a Systematic Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Application of biomaterials in mesenchymal stem cell based endometrial reconstruction: current status and challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Bioengineering approaches for the endometrial research and application.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Animal models of the placenta accreta spectrum: current status and further perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decellularized extracellular matrices (d-ECMs) currently utilized to repair endometrial injuries are derived from three tissue sources, the endometrium (dE-ECM), placental amniotic membrane (dA-ECM), and urinary (dU-ECM). Notably, the structures of dU-ECM and dE-ECM are similar. These d-ECMs are derived from different tissues, and their specific roles in endometrial injury repair remain unclear. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of the tissue microstructures and compositions to confirm specific differences among the three ECM types. And using a rat model of endometrial injury, the effects of all the matrices after implantation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.