ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Native RNA or cDNA Sequencing for Transcriptomic Analysis: A Case Study on
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening and Bioinformatic Analysis of Drought-Adaptive-Response Genes in WildInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Metabolic Reprogramming Mechanism by Pueraria Lobata Fermentation Enhances Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reducing-Sugar-Releasing Activity and Polypeptide Synthesis.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- An rRNA-depleted full-length transcriptome strategy using nanopore sequencing for identification of novel lncRNA isoforms.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Designing RNA sequencing experiments: A practical guide to reproducible gene expression analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Polyadenylation landscape of in vivo long-term potentiation in the rat brain.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Commentary: a review of technical considerations for planning an RNA-Sequencing experiment.BMC genomics · 2025Review
- Enhancing transcriptome expression quantification through accurate assignment of long RNA sequencing reads with TranSigner.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A systematic benchmark of Nanopore long-read RNA sequencing for transcript-level analysis in human cell lines.Nature methods · 2025Article
- DEMINERS enables clinical metagenomics and comparative transcriptomic analysis by increasing throughput and accuracy of nanopore direct RNA sequencing.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Environmental community transcriptomics: strategies and struggles.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Review
- Challenges in identifying mRNA transcript starts and ends from long-read sequencing data.Genome research · 2024Review
- Epitranscriptome insights into Riccia fluitans L. (Marchantiophyta) aquatic transition using nanopore direct RNA sequencing.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Advanced Omics Techniques for Understanding Cochlear Genome, Epigenome, and Transcriptome in Health and Disease.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Merging short and stranded long reads improves transcript assembly.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Direct sequencing of single molecules through nanopores allows for accurate quantification and full-length characterization of native RNA or complementary DNA (cDNA) without amplification. Both nanopore-based native RNA and cDNA approaches involve complex transcriptome procedures at a lower cost. However, there are several differences between the two approaches. In this study, we perform matched native RNA sequencing and cDNA sequencing to enable relevant comparisons and evaluation. Using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.