Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497185›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Radar remote sensing-based inversion model of soil salt content at different depths under vegetation.

Yinwen Chen, Yuyan Du, Haoyuan Yin, Huiyun Wang, Haiying Chen, Xianwen Li, Zhitao Zhang, Junying Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yinwen ChenCollege of Language and Culture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Yuyan DuGansu Water Conservancy & Hydro Power Survey & Design Research Institute, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Haoyuan YinCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Huiyun WangCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Haiying ChenCollege of Language and Culture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Xianwen LiCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Zhitao ZhangCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Junying ChenCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive soil salt content (SSC) seriously affects the crop growth and economic benefits in the agricultural production area. Prior research mainly focused on estimating the salinity in the top bare soil rather than in deep soil that is vital to crop growth. For this end, an experiment was carried out in the Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia, China. In the experiment, the SSC at different depths under vegetation was measured, and the Sentinel-1 radar images were obtained synchronously. The radar backscattering coefficients (VV and VH) were combined to construct multiple indices, whose sensitivity was then analyzed using the best subset selection (BSS). Meanwhile, four most commonly used algorithms, partial least squares regression (PLSR), quantile regression (QR), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme learning machine (ELM), were utilized to construct estimation models of salinity at the depths of 0-10, 10-20, 0-20, 20-40, 0-40, 40-60 and 0-60 cm before and after BSS, respectively. The results showed: (a) radar remote sensing can be used to estimate the salinity in the root zone of vegetation (0-30 cm); (b) after BSS, the correlation coefficients and estimation accuracy of the four monitoring models were all improved significantly; (c) the estimation accuracy of the four regression models was: SVM > QR > ELM > PLSR; and (d) among the seven sampling depths, 10-20 cm was the optimal inversion depth for all the four models, followed by 20-40 and 0-40 cm. Among the four models, SVM was higher in accuracy than the other three at 10-20 cm (R

Indexed as

Remote Sensing TechnologySoilRadarSodium ChlorideSodium Chloride, DietarySodium ChlorideSodium Chloride, DietarySoilBest subset selectionRadar remote sensingSoil at different depthsSoil salt contentSupport vector machinevegetation coverage

Identifiers

PMID35497185
PMCPMC9053309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.