Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497067›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Rural-urban and gender differences in metabolic syndrome in the aging population from southern India: Two parallel, prospective cohort studies.

Jonas S Sundarakumar, Albert Stezin, Abhishek L Menesgere, Vijayalakshmi Ravindranath, SANSCOG and TLSA Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Extent and Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Adults of Varanasi, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas S SundarakumarCentre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560012, India.
Albert StezinCentre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560012, India.
Abhishek L MenesgereCentre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560012, India.
Vijayalakshmi RavindranathCentre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560012, India.
SANSCOG and TLSA Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing evidence of metabolic syndrome as a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, there are limited studies from India on its prevalence, especially in the aging population. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and associated comorbidities in two prospective, aging cohorts from rural and urban India. Methods: In these two parallel, prospective, aging (≥ 45 years) cohorts, the samples included 2171 people from rural India (Srinivaspura Aging, Neuro Senescence and COGnition, SANSCOG cohort; April 23, 2018 to Sept 25, 2021) and 332 people from urban India (Tata Longitudinal Study on Aging, TLSA cohort; July 8, 2015 to Oct 23, 2021). Using cross-sectional data from baseline clinical and biochemical assessments, we calculated metabolic syndrome prevalence using two well established criteria, namely consensus criteria and National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) criteria; further, rural-urban, gender, and age-wise differences were compared. Findings: Proportions of metabolic syndrome were 46.2 and 54.8% as per consensus criteria in rural and urban participants, respectively; corresponding numbers using NCEP-ATP III criteria were 40.3 and 45.1%. Rural-dwelling older adults had a significantly lesser prevalence of all individual metabolic syndrome parameters except impaired triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein levels. Rural women had a significantly higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome than rural men, whereas there was no significant difference among urban participants. We did not observe any consistent age-wise trend when comparing both cohorts. There was high burden of comorbidities among both groups, mostly undiagnosed in rural participants. Interpretation: Roughly one in two older adults had metabolic syndrome, urban significantly more than rural, reaching an alarming 63.1% among urban participants aged 65-74 years. The very high prevalence of undiagnosed co-morbidities among rural adults is extremely concerning, calling for urgent public health measures in this marginalised and health-disparate population. Funding: SANSCOG study is funded through the Centre for Brain Research (CBR), Indian Institute of Science (IISc) by Pratiksha Trust, the philanthropic arm of Mr. Kris Gopalakrishnan. TLSA is funded by Tata Trusts.

Indexed as

AgingCohortGender differenceIndiaMetabolic syndromePrevalenceRuralUrban

Identifiers

PMID35497067
PMCPMC9044001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.