ArticleHeliyon2022
Validation and measurement invariance of the Arabic Health Literacy Questionnaire.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and Assessment of Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of the Polish Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in Health Professions Students.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Translation and cultural adaptation of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ) in Morocco.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Developing a validity testing plan for a patient-reported outcome measure in a new context using the argument-based approach to validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Understanding patients' self-management after enterostomy: knowledge, attitudes, and practices in a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the health literacy questionnaire tested in Vietnamese adults with chronic diseases.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Health literacy strengths and challenges of people in New South Wales prisons: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).BMC public health · 2023Article
- Psychometric validation of the fear of progression questionnaire-short form in acute pancreatitis patients.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Health literacy among adolescents and young adults in the Eastern Mediterranean region: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Health Literacy and Smoking Habits Among a Sample of Jordanian University Students.Journal of community health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health literacy plays a key role in empowering individuals and enabling them to make health-related decisions. Despite the advances in health literacy research, there are gaps in the literature that require further inquiry, and establishing comprehensive and valid measurements is one of them. Thus, this research was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), including the reliability, validity, and measurement invariances of the nine HLQ scales. A cross-sectional design was used in this study. A sample of university students (N = 1011) was recruited, the mean of age was 21.1 years old (SD = 2.28). The Arabic HLQ and a demographics questionnaire were completed by the participants. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and measurement invariances were performed for each HLQ scale. The values of Cronbach's α and composite reliability were above .70 for all HLQ scales. The CFA analyses showed that all HLQ scales meet the criteria that were set
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.