Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497044›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Evolution of maternal and neonatal outcomes before and after the adoption of the IADPSG/WHO guidelines in Belgium: A descriptive study of 444,228 pregnancies.

Philippe Oriot, Charlotte Leroy, Virginie Van Leeuw, Jean Christophe Philips, Jean François Vanderijst, Aline Vuckovic, Elena Costa, Christian Debauche, Frederic Chantraine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philippe OriotDepartment of Diabetology, Mouscron Hospital Centre, Avenue de Fécamp 49, 7700, Mouscron, Belgium.
Charlotte LeroyCentre d'Épidémiologie Périnatale (CEpiP), Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, bte B1.30.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Virginie Van LeeuwCentre d'Épidémiologie Périnatale (CEpiP), Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, bte B1.30.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean Christophe PhilipsDiabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, Liege University, CHU Sart-Tilman, Avenue de L'Hôpital 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Jean François VanderijstDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Clinique Saint-Pierre, Av. Reine Fabiola 9, 1340 Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Aline VuckovicNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. Jean Joseph Crocq 15, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
Elena CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasme Hospital, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Christian DebaucheDepartment of Neonatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Av. Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Frederic ChantraineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, site CHR Citadelle, Boulevard du 12ème de Ligne, 1, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To appraise adverse pregnancy outcomes after the adoption of IADPSG/WHO guidelines in Belgium. Methods: A retrospective study of the Center for Perinatal Epidemiology registry was conducted. Demographic changes and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between a pre- and post-guideline period in women with and without hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP). Adjusted odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes controlling for potential confounders (maternal age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, parity, and multiple births). Results: The prevalence of HIP increased (6.0%-9.2%). In the overall population regardless of glycemic status, gestational weight gain (12.3 ± 5.7 vs 11.9 ± 5.8; p < 0.001), hypertension (0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94; p < 0.001), and neonatal intensive care unit/special care nursery (0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.91; p < 0.001) decreased despite increasing maternal age and pre-pregnancy BMI. Emergency cesarean section rates (1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09; p < 0.001) increased, but not in the HIP population (1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10; Conclusion: After the implementation of IADPSG/WHO guidelines, the prevalence of HIP increased by 53.7% and the incidence of major HIP-related pregnancy complications appears to be lower. However, we cannot conclude that the reduction of LGA-macrosomia is due to a better management of diabetes or due to greater recruitment of women with mild HIP associated with a lower risk of obstetrical complications.

Indexed as

DiabetesEpidemiologyGestational diabetes mellitusHyperglycemia in pregnancyIADPSG/WHO criteriaPregnancy complicationsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID35497044
PMCPMC9038558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.