Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35497022›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2022

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Stool Antigen Test Using Bioluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay for Detecting

Toshihiko Kakiuchi, Muneaki Matsuo, Yasuhisa Sakata, Kazuma Fujimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CurrentJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Clinical validation of a fecal PCR assay forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  3. Clinical Utility ofInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Toshihiko KakiuchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9995-5522
Muneaki MatsuoDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Yasuhisa SakataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Kazuma FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare, Ohkawa, Fukuoka 831-0016, Japan.
Saga University · JPFukuoka International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: BLEIA ™ "EIKEN" Methods: In the project for Results: The comparison of B (EIA) with Quick Chaser Conclusion: B (EIA) that is based on the BLEIA method, which applies firefly luciferase luminescence, is more sensitive than stool antigen test kits that are currently marketed in Japan and is very useful in diagnosing

Indexed as

Helicobacter pyloriChildFecesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesJapan

Identifiers

PMID35497022
PMCPMC9050312
OpenAlexW4224210589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.