ArticleRSC advances2022
Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure guided design and molecular modelling of a novel peptide-SWCNT biosensor targeting NS1 dengue virus.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 N protein using AgNPs-modified aligned silicon nanowires BioSERS chip.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Enhanced sensitivity in electrochemical detection of ochratoxin A within food samples using ferrocene- and aptamer-tethered gold nanoparticles on disposable electrodes.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Virtual Screening of Peptide Libraries: The Search for Peptide-Based Therapeutics Using Computational Tools.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- An engineered thermally tolerant apo-cytochrome scaffold for metal-less incorporation of heme derivative.PloS one · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of potential key genes and pathways in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IL-6 is an important interleukin associated with inflammation and several diseases such as cancer. Evaluation of its levels in human blood sera is a critical step for an accurate diagnosis of the diseases. Our goal is to design peptides that can selectively bind in different poses with good affinities to IL-6. For this purpose, we started from the crystal structures of different IL-6/protein complexes available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) to select short peptides in the interaction zones, in which we intentionally introduced point mutations to increase their stability and affinity. To examine their usefulness as capture and reporting probes for the IL-6 biosensing, the five peptides and their interaction with IL-6 were studied in saline aqueous solution. Molecular docking, MD, and MM-PBSA were used to investigate the affinity and stability of these complexes. The conformational changes, the distance between the mass centers, the gyration radii, and the numbers of hydrogen bonds were analyzed to select the most suitable candidates. Three peptides, namely CTE17, CAY15 and CSE25, have the highest affinities presenting significant numbers of residues that have contact frequencies greater than 50% of simulation run time and are the most promising candidates. CTE17 and CSE25 showed they can form a stable sandwich with the target protein. For sake of comparison, we examined the previously known peptides (FND20, INL19 and CEK17) having affinity to IL-6 and the affinity of the lead
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.