Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496816›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

Validation and extension of the METSSS score in a metastatic cancer patient cohort after palliative radiotherapy within the last phase of life.

Sebastian M Christ, Markus Schettle, Jonas Willmann, Maiwand Ahmadsei, Annina Seiler, David Blum, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Caroline Hertler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastian M ChristDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus SchettleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maiwand AhmadseiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Annina SeilerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David BlumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Caroline HertlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and background: Choosing the right treatment for the right patient in a setting of metastatic cancer disease remains a challenge. To facilitate clinical decision-making, predictive tools have been developed to personalize treatment. Here, we aim to assess the use of the recently proposed "METSSS score" as a prognostic tool for overall survival of cancer patients after palliative radiotherapy in the last phase of life. Methods: All patients treated with palliative radiotherapy at the end-of-life at the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. Data on demographics, diagnosis, treatment and comorbidities was extracted from the treatment planning and the electronical medical records system. To statistically assess the validity of the "METSSS score", the mortality risk score was calculated, followed by stratification of all patients to prognostic risk groups. The prediction of the 1-year overall survival estimates was subsequently calculated. Results: Over the past decade, 274 patients have received palliative radiotherapy during the end-of-life period. One third of patients was female (34%, n = 93). The most frequent primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 121, 44%), and 55% of patients (n = 152) had no comorbidities according to the Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index. The most common radiotherapy site was the brain and eye region (42%, n = 115). The median actual overall survival of all patients was 40 days from the start of radiotherapy. The "METSSS score" survival model predicted that 269 patients (98.1%) belong into the high-risk, four patients (1.5%) into the medium-risk, and one patient (0.4%) into the low-risk group. The predicted median 1-year overall survival was 10%. Discussion: The METSSS score correctly predicted the survival of our end-of-life patient cohort by assigning them into the highest risk category, and it can therefore serve as a decision-making tool when assigning patient to symptomatic radiotherapy.

Indexed as

CCI, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity indexECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusEMR, Electronical medical recordsKPS, Karnofsky performance scoreMETSSS, Metastasis location elderly/age tumor primary sex sickness/comorbidity and site of radiotherapyMETSSS scoreNCDB, National Cancer Data BasePalliativeRadiotherapyRT, Radiation therapySurvival predictionTEACHH, Type of cancer ECOG age prior palliative chemotherapy, prior hospitalizations and hepatic metastasisTPS, Treatment planning systemUSZ, University Hospital Zurich

Identifiers

PMID35496816
PMCPMC9038557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.