Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496706›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2022

Teaching Basic Calculations in an Introductory Biology Lab.

John H Horne, Henry W Woolley, Aubrey Roy, Wendy M Schluchter, Jerome J Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John H HorneDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Henry W WoolleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Aubrey RoyThe Mark, USA (formerly SmartStart Evaluation and Research), Irvine, California, USA.
Wendy M SchluchterDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Jerome J HowardDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative reasoning is one of the core competencies identified as a priority for transforming the undergraduate biology curriculum. However, first-year biology majors often lack confidence in their quantitative skills. We revised an introductory biology lab to emphasize the teaching of basic laboratory calculations, utilizing multiple teaching tools, including online prelab quizzes, minilab lectures, calculation worksheets, and online video tutorials. In addition, we implemented a repetitive assessment approach whereby three types of basic calculations-unit conversions, calculating molar concentrations, and calculating dilutions-were assessed on all quizzes and exams throughout the semester. The results showed that learning improved for each of the three quantitative problem types assessed and that these learning gains were statistically significant, both from first assessment to midterm and, notably, from midterm to final. Additionally, the most challenging problem type for students, calculating molar concentrations, showed the greatest normalized learning gains in the second half of the semester. The latter result suggests that persistent assessment resulted in continued learning even after formal, in-class teaching of these approaches had ended. This approach can easily be applied to other courses in the curriculum and, given the learning gains achieved, could provide a powerful means to target other quantitative skills.

Indexed as

calculationsintroductory biologylaboratory coursequantitativeundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID35496706
PMCPMC9053032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.