ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2022
CRISPR in Your Kitchen: an At-Home CRISPR Kit to Edit Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Used during a Remote Lab Course.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why online science education falls short.iScience · 2025Review
- Backstage Heroes-Yeast in COVID-19 Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting plus nanopore DNA sequencing with the plasmid pBR322 in the classroom.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024Article
- A frugal CRISPR kit for equitable and accessible education in gene editing and synthetic biology.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in underserved Latinx communities.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Online Instruction and Effective Pedagogy That Blurs the Lines between Online and On-Site Teaching and Learning.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2022Article
- Are null segregants new combinations of heritable material and should they be regulated?Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of CRISPR-based experiments in an undergraduate course is appealing because of the ease of editing, and the relevance of CRISPR to current research. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed an in-person lab for a high-enrollment course that allowed students to design and conduct CRISPR editing experiments in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Post pandemic, the lab course moved online, and we lost the hands-on component. We subsequently developed an at-home kit that contained all the necessary materials for students to grow and transform S. cerevisiae with the DNA molecules necessary for CRISPR-Cas9 induced editing. Our at-home kits cost approximately $70 each to produce and were shipped to over 600 students during the 2020 to 2021 academic year. By adding the at-home experimental work to our remote, online lab course, students were able to generate loss-of-function mutants in ADE2 (causing a red color phenotype). Students were able to send edited yeast samples back to campus for sequencing, allowing for characterization of the different mutations that can occur due to CRISPR-Cas9 induced editing. Here, we described the protocol to produce and use the kits and summarized the student experience of using the at-home kit in a large enrollment, remote lab course. These kits provided opportunities to engage students in hands-on experimentation during a remote course and could also be used to reach learners in other domains, such as high schools and outreach programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.