Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496678›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2022

Online Strategies To Improve Quantitative Skills in Microbiology Laboratory Classes.

Joseph M Battistelli, Rima B Franklin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph M BattistelliDepartment of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Rima B FranklinDepartment of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology is an increasingly quantitative science. Thus, it is important that undergraduate biology curricula include frequent opportunities for students to practice their quantitative skills. This can create a substantial grading burden for faculty teaching online and/or large enrollment courses, but the "formula question" feature present in many learning management systems (LMS) offers a solution. Using this feature, faculty set up a basic scaffold for an algebraic word problem, and the LMS can then automatically generate and grade many different versions of the question. In this paper, we describe the use of "formula questions" in an undergraduate microbiology course and specifically focus on how the strategic use of algebraic word problems at multiple points throughout the semester can help build quantitative literacy. Key to the success of this approach is that faculty provide a review of foundational mathematical skills early in the semester, even in upper-level classes. This should include reacquainting students with formatting conventions (e.g., rounding and scientific notation), familiarizing them with any idiosyncrasies of the technology platforms, and demonstrating how to solve math problems using spreadsheets. This initial effort increases student success when more complex problems are introduced later in the semester. Though the tips summarized in this paper focus on undergraduate microbiology teaching laboratories using Canvas, the approach can easily be modified to help students develop their critical thinking and quantitative reasoning skills at other levels and in other disciplines.

Indexed as

algebraCanvasformula questionformula questionsmath skillsproblem solvingquantitative biologyquantitative literacyspreadsheetsword problems

Identifiers

PMID35496678
PMCPMC9053067
OpenAlexW4220943573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.