Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496625›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

Microfluidic paper device for rapid detection of aflatoxin B1 using an aptamer based colorimetric assay.

Aruna Kasoju, Narlawar Sagar Shrikrishna, Deepshikha Shahdeo, Azmat Ali Khan, Amer M Alanazi, Sonu Gandhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Aflatoxin exposure and health impacts: global burden and advances in detection technologies.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aruna KasojuDBT-National Institute of Animal Biotechnology Hyderabad-500032 India sonugandhi@gmail.com gandhi@niab.org.in.
Narlawar Sagar ShrikrishnaDBT-National Institute of Animal Biotechnology Hyderabad-500032 India sonugandhi@gmail.com gandhi@niab.org.in.
Deepshikha ShahdeoDBT-National Institute of Animal Biotechnology Hyderabad-500032 India sonugandhi@gmail.com gandhi@niab.org.in.
Azmat Ali KhanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University Riyadh-11451 Saudi Arabia.
Amer M AlanaziDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University Riyadh-11451 Saudi Arabia.
Sonu GandhiDBT-National Institute of Animal Biotechnology Hyderabad-500032 India sonugandhi@gmail.com gandhi@niab.org.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-2780

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS 27302C0038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of milk by mycotoxins is a serious problem worldwide. Herein, we focused on the detection of aflatoxin B1 (AflB1) using a paper microfluidic device fabricated with specific aptamers as biorecognition elements. The fabrication process resulted in the generation of a leak proof microfluidic device where two zones were designed: control and test. Detection is achieved by color change when aflatoxin reacts with an aptamer followed by salt induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Specific aptamers for aflatoxin B1 were immobilized successfully onto the surface of gold nanoparticles. Biophysical characterization of the conjugated AuNPs-aptamer was done by UV-vis spectroscopy, DLS (dynamic light scattering), TEM (transmission electron microscopy). Under optimal conditions, the microfluidic device showed an excellent response for aflatoxin B1 detection in the range of 1 pM to 1 μM with a detection limit of up to 10 nM in spiked samples. Disadvantages associated with conventional techniques of ELISA were overcome by this one step detection technique with low operation cost, simple instrumentation, and user-friendly format with no interference due to chromatographic separation. The developed microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) can provide a tool for on-site detection of food toxins in less than a minute which is the main requirement for both qualitative and quantitative analysis in food safety and environmental monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID35496625
PMCPMC9050516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.