Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496357›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics

Maximum subjective outcome improvement is reported by 3 Months following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A systematic review.

Joshua P Castle, Lafi S Khalil, Muhammad J Abbas, Stephanie DeBolle, Marissa Tandron, Austin G Cross, Guillermo A Rodriguez, Kelechi R Okoroha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua P CastleHenry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Lafi S KhalilHenry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Muhammad J AbbasHenry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Stephanie DeBolleHenry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Marissa TandronWayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Austin G CrossHenry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Guillermo A RodriguezWayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Kelechi R OkorohaThe Mayo Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To review patient outcomes in the literature following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in order to identify when patients report reaching subjective maximal improvement postoperatively. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 2004 to August 2019 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines to identify articles evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) up to a minimum of 6 months after APM in patients >18 years old. Studies were excluded if additional interventions were performed such as repairs, ligamentous reconstruction or repair, cartilaginous manipulation, or revision surgery. PROMs were pooled between studies at preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 year time points. Weighted averages were used within a mixed model method in order to account for the differences in sample size and variance among studies. Significant improvements in PROMs at various time intervals were statistically analyzed using minimal clinically important difference. Results: A total of 12 studies including 1663 patients who underwent APM were selected for the review. The pooled cohort consisted of 1033 (62%) males and 630 (38%) females. Significant improvements were demonstrated from preoperative scores to 3 months postoperatively in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subcategories, Lysholm, and visual analog scale scores while no differences were found for Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Although statistically significant improvement in PROMs remained at all postoperative time points compared to preoperative scores, no significant differences were observed after 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing APM had significant mean changes in legacy PROMs by 3 months postoperatively that exceeded given minimal clinically important difference values, without further clinically important improvement reported up to 2 years postoperatively. Study design: Level III, systematic review.

Indexed as

ArthroscopicKneeMaximal medical improvementMeniscal tearMeniscectomyMeniscusPatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID35496357
PMCPMC9043384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.