ArticleInternational journal of educational technology in higher education2022
Effects of captions, transcripts and reminders on learning and perceptions of lecture capture.
Article in International journal of educational technology in higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exam-level analysis of lecture capture viewing and student exam performance.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Transcript Accuracy in Preclinical Medical School Lectures.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Lecture Capture, Transcripts, and Captioning in US Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned from Integrating Educational Technology into the Preclerkship Teaching of Pulmonary Medicine.ATS scholar · 2024Review
- Classroom recordings: Utilization and influence on course performance.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2024Article
- Article
- Lecture capture affects student learning behaviour.FEBS open bio · 2023Article
- Perception from students regarding online synchronous interactive teaching in the clinical year during COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Effects of captions, transcripts and reminders on learning and perceptions of lecture capture.International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2022Article
- Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Technological forecasting and social change · 2022Article
- Effects of virtual learning environments: A scoping review of literature.Education and information technologies · 2022Article
- Towards teaching analytics: a contextual model for analysis of students' evaluation of teaching through text mining and machine learning classification.Education and information technologies · 2022Article
- Evaluating the use of informational technologies by students of healthcare colleges for academic purposes over a five-year period.Education and information technologies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lecture capture is popular within Higher Education, but previous research suggests that students do not always optimally select content to review, nor do they make the most of specific functions. In the current study conducted in the 2019/20 academic year, we used a repeated-measures crossover design to establish the effects of transcripts with closed captioning, and email reminders, on use (self-reported and system analytics), perceptions of lecture capture and student performance, as measured by multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests designed to assess the module learning outcomes. System analytics (N = 129) and survey data (N = 42) were collected from students alongside qualitative data from semi-structured interviews (N = 8). We found that students value lecture capture highly, but do not access it extensively during the teaching period. The availability of transcripts and closed captions did not impact the amount of capture use or performance on MCQ tests, but did result in more positive perceptions of capture, including increased likelihood of recommending it to others. The use of email reminders referring students to specific segments of capture and reminding them of the functionality had no impact on any measure, although qualitative data suggested that the content of reminders may be used in revision rather than during the teaching period, which fell outside the period we investigated. Collectively, these data suggest that the use of captions and transcripts may be beneficial to students by allowing dual processing of visual and audio content, and a searchable resource to help consolidate their learning but there is little evidence to support reminders. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41239-022-00327-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.