Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496323›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of educational technology in higher education2022

Effects of captions, transcripts and reminders on learning and perceptions of lecture capture.

Eleanor J Dommett, Larisa M Dinu, Wijnand Van Tilburg, Samuel Keightley, Benjamin Gardner

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of educational technology in higher education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of captions, transcripts and reminders on learning and perceptions of lecture capture.International journal of educational technology in higher education · 2022
    Article
  10. Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Technological forecasting and social change · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor J DommettDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-8762
Larisa M DinuDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF UK.
Wijnand Van TilburgDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester Campus, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK.
Samuel KeightleyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF UK.
Benjamin GardnerDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lecture capture is popular within Higher Education, but previous research suggests that students do not always optimally select content to review, nor do they make the most of specific functions. In the current study conducted in the 2019/20 academic year, we used a repeated-measures crossover design to establish the effects of transcripts with closed captioning, and email reminders, on use (self-reported and system analytics), perceptions of lecture capture and student performance, as measured by multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests designed to assess the module learning outcomes. System analytics (N = 129) and survey data (N = 42) were collected from students alongside qualitative data from semi-structured interviews (N = 8). We found that students value lecture capture highly, but do not access it extensively during the teaching period. The availability of transcripts and closed captions did not impact the amount of capture use or performance on MCQ tests, but did result in more positive perceptions of capture, including increased likelihood of recommending it to others. The use of email reminders referring students to specific segments of capture and reminding them of the functionality had no impact on any measure, although qualitative data suggested that the content of reminders may be used in revision rather than during the teaching period, which fell outside the period we investigated. Collectively, these data suggest that the use of captions and transcripts may be beneficial to students by allowing dual processing of visual and audio content, and a searchable resource to help consolidate their learning but there is little evidence to support reminders. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41239-022-00327-9.

Indexed as

AnalyticsLecture captureStudent performance

Identifiers

PMID35496323
PMCPMC9038223
OpenAlexW4224805283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.