Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35496075›Full record

ArticlePastoral psychology2022

Spirituality and Children's Coping with Representation of Death During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Research with Parents.

Sara Pompele, Valentina Ghetta, Serena Veronese, Mihaela Dana Bucuță, Ines Testoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pastoral psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara PompeleDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Valentina GhettaDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Serena VeroneseDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Mihaela Dana BucuțăLucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Ines TestoniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the related lockdown measures have had intense negative impacts on the psychological well-being of both adults and children. Among such impacts is a significant increase in mortality salience and changes in how people deal with grief and losses. This qualitative research used semi-structured interviews with 23 Italian parents to draw insights on the impact of the pandemic on children aged 5-15 years with regard to their representation of death and the eventual role that family spirituality/ religiosity played in helping them understand both the concept of dying and possibly the pandemic itself. From the data analysis, four main thematic areas emerged: "Lockdown experience," "Fears and worries related to COVID-19," "Emergence of thoughts on the process of dying," and "Representation of death and the impact of religious beliefs." The participants highlighted how stressful the lockdown measures have been for their children and the anxiety that their children have experienced because of fears related to the pandemic. The interviews also surfaced how living in a religious family has contributed significantly to shaping children's representation and understanding of death and sometimes even helped both the parents and their children to face difficult moments such as those caused by the pandemic.

Indexed as

Children’s representation of deathCOVID-19Mortality salienceReligiosity

Identifiers

PMID35496075
PMCPMC9043098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.