Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495898›Full record

ReviewGefasschirurgie : Zeitschrift fur vaskulare und endovaskulare Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie unter Mitarbeit der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie2022

[Vascular injury-An underestimated entity?]

Thomas Jerkku, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Ramin Banafsche

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gefasschirurgie : Zeitschrift fur vaskulare und endovaskulare Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie unter Mitarbeit der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fur Gefasschirurgie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas JerkkuAbteilung Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Nikolaos TsilimparisAbteilung Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Ramin BanafscheAbteilung Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vessels are not frequently affected in traumatology and isolated vascular trauma (VT) is rare; therefore, there is a lack of reliable and current data on the incidence and mortality. Objective: This article reports on the status of VT in trauma care of the severely injured in Germany based on selected references and data from our own published analyses and current studies from the data of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU). Material and methods: Selected review of the literature and report on 2 retrospective assessments of datasets of the TR-DGU. Records with moderate to severe VT in the injury pattern were compared to records of cases without VT (non-VT) with the same injury severity. Target parameters were morbidity, mortality and parameters of the clinical course and prognosis. Results: The 2002-2012 database evaluation (TR-DGU Project-ID 2013-011) revealed an impact of allocation and level of care of the trauma centers on expected mortality (EM) and observed mortality (OM) in 2961 cases with VT among 42,326 severely injured patients (7%). The difference between OM and EM in VT was + 3.4% vs. ± 0.1% in non-VT. Due to an OM in severe VT of 33.8% vs. 16.4% in non-VT with identical injury severity, the subsequent analysis of 2008-2017 (TR-DGU Project-ID 2018-045) was initiated. The sub-stratification of isolated, main and concomitant VT could show a significant effect of the treatment level, allocation and transport on the OM in the treatment reality. A relevant mismatch of OM to EM could only be shown in VT, on average ca. + 2% and in high-risk constellations with VT up to + 29% as a measure for the relevance of VT in trauma care. Conclusion: These results indicate a substantial need for further optimization of emergency care of severely injured patients with VT, where VT vigilance, allocation, transportation and a low threshold early re-allocation can be derived as starting points.

Indexed as

AllocationMortalityPrognosisSeverely injuredVascular trauma

Identifiers

PMID35495898
PMCPMC9040697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.