Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495884›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Efficient Framework for Detection of COVID-19 Omicron and Delta Variants Based on Two Intelligent Phases of CNN Models.

Mustafa Ghaderzadeh, Mohammad Amir Eshraghi, Farkhondeh Asadi, Azamossadat Hosseini, Ramezan Jafari, Davood Bashash, Hassan Abolghasemi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 Data Analytics Using Extended Convolutional Technique.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa GhaderzadehStudent Research Committee, Department and Faculty of Health Information Technology and Management School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-3843
Mohammad Amir EshraghiSchool of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-2487
Farkhondeh AsadiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-7983
Azamossadat HosseiniDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-1154
Ramezan JafariDepartment of Radiology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-4259
Davood BashashDepartment of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-4920
Hassan AbolghasemiPediatric Congenital Hematologic Disorders Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-5029
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Science and Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While the COVID-19 pandemic was waning in most parts of the world, a new wave of COVID-19 Omicron and Delta variants in Central Asia and the Middle East caused a devastating crisis and collapse of health-care systems. As the diagnostic methods for this COVID-19 variant became more complex, health-care centers faced a dramatic increase in patients. Thus, the need for less expensive and faster diagnostic methods led researchers and specialists to work on improving diagnostic testing. Method: Inspired by the COVID-19 diagnosis methods, the latest and most efficient deep learning algorithms in the field of extracting X-ray and CT scan image features were used to identify COVID-19 in the early stages of the disease. Results: We presented a general framework consisting of two models which are developed by convolutional neural network (CNN) using the concept of transfer learning and parameter optimization. The proposed phase of the framework was evaluated on the test dataset and yielded remarkable results and achieved a detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.99, 0.986, and 0.988, for the first phase and 0.997, 0.9976, and 0.997 for the second phase, respectively. In all cases, the whole framework was able to successfully classify COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases from CT scans and X-ray images. Conclusion: Since the proposed framework was based on two deep learning models that used two radiology modalities, it was able to significantly assist radiologists in detecting COVID-19 in the early stages. The use of models with this feature can be considered as a powerful and reliable tool, compared to the previous models used in the past pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningCOVID-19 TestingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35495884
PMCPMC9050257
OpenAlexW4224241993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.