Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495872›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2022

Smoking Cessation by Phone Counselling in a Lung Cancer Screening Program: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Ankita Ghatak, Sean Gilman, Siobhan Carney, Anne V Gonzalez, Andrea Benedetti, Nicole Ezer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ankita GhatakDivision of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-6906
Sean GilmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Siobhan CarneyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anne V GonzalezDivision of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-2948
Andrea BenedettiResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicole EzerDivision of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-6418
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation integration within lung cancer screening programs is challenging. Currently, phone counselling is available across Canada for individuals referred by healthcare workers and by self-referral. We compared quit rates after phone counselling interventions between participants who self-refer, those referred by healthcare workers, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of participants referred to provincial smoking cessation quit line in contemporaneous cohorts: self-referred participants, healthcare worker referred, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program if they were still actively smoking at the time of first contact. Baseline, covariates (sociodemographic information, smoking history, and history of mental health disorder) and quit intentions (stage of change, readiness for change, previous use of quit programs, and previous quit attempts) were compared among the three cohorts. Our primary outcome was defined as self-reported 30-day abstinence rates at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify whether group assignment was associated with higher quit rates. Results: Participants referred by a lung cancer screening program had low quit rates (12%, 95% CI: 5-19) at six months despite the use of phone counselling. Compared to patients who were self-referred to the smoking cessation phone helpline, individuals referred by a lung cancer screening program were much less likely to quit (adjusted OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.8), whereas those referred by healthcare workers were twice as likely to quit (adjusted OR 2.16 (1.3-3.58)) even after adjustment for differences in smoking intensity and quit intentions. Conclusions: Phone counselling alone has very limited benefit in a lung cancer screening program. Participants differ significantly from those who are otherwise referred by healthcare workers. This study underlines the importance of a dedicated and personalized tobacco treatment program within every lung cancer screening program. The program should incorporate best practices and encourage treatment regardless of readiness to quit.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmoking CessationCohort StudiesCounselingEarly Detection of CancerHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35495872
PMCPMC9050320
OpenAlexW4224274488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.