ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Weaning of septic patients from the ventilator in the intensive care unit by attention approach to common antibiotic regimens.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Time Predictive Analysis of ICU Ventilator Weaning Failure: A Prospective Validation Study.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a chronic blood infection that is more common in patients with ventilatory and disability. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of common antibiotic regimens on weaning sepsis patients from mechanical ventilator. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we classified 70 sepsis patients under mechanical ventilation which sedates with midazolam and do not take muscle relaxants into two groups: meropenem and levofloxacin versus meropenem, levofloxacin, and clindamycin. The duration of intubation and the number of patients who needed re-intubation (and their duration of extubation) were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: In the present study, 68.6% were male and 31.4% were female. The mean age was calculated to be 37.98. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the ICU in the group of two drugs (meropenem + levofloxacin) showed a significant decrease compared to the group of three drugs ( Conclusion: The differences in terms of mean duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay between the groups indicate that the two-drug regimen (meropenem + levofloxacin) is more efficient in bringing [sepsis] patients back to recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.