Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495782›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Household sanitation and menstrual hygiene management among women: Evidence from household survey under Swachh Bharat (Clean India) Mission in rural Odisha, India.

Manas Ranjan Behera, Subhashree Parida, Himanshu Sekhar Pradhan, Sucheta Priyabadini, Ranjit Kumar Dehury, Biswajit Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What Drives Open-air Defecation and How Widespread Is It? A Mixed Methods Study from a Tribal Predominant Block of Jharkhand, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manas Ranjan BeheraSchool of Public Health, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Subhashree ParidaSchool of Public Health, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Himanshu Sekhar PradhanSchool of Public Health, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sucheta PriyabadiniDirector, Student Counselling, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ranjit Kumar DehurySchool of Management Studies, University of Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Biswajit MishraDean, Quality Assurance, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Discussion on women empowerment without addressing their basic needs would be meaningless. As such, the needs of women and girls have been prioritized in global sanitation efforts including menstrual hygiene. However, there is little research on existing approaches on menstrual management. India's most ambitious sanitation campaign named Swachh Bharat Mission or "Clean India Mission" aimed to achieve universal sanitation coverage in every single household, targeted to end open defecation by October 02, 2019. This study aimed to assess the women's perception of household sanitation facilities and menstrual hygiene management experience in Odisha under Swachh Bharat Mission. Methods: The study is a community-based survey having cross-sectional in nature conducted among 700 rural women and girls aged 15-45 years in the Balesore district of Odisha state in India from January to April 2021. A multi-stage sampling method was adopted to select the study participants. Data was collected using a pretested questionnaire based on the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics was used to assess the household sanitation and menstrual hygiene management experience among women. Results: More than two-thirds (68.4%) of rural households use improved sanitation facilities. Around 30% of families have inadequate sanitation infrastructure, which means at least one household member defecates in the open space. Nearly 64.6% disposed of their menstrual absorbents in the bush or field, while 29.1% disposed in the river and 24.1% in the waste bin. Still, 40.6% of women were using clothes as menstrual absorbents, and 54.9% of the respondents reported washing their menstrual materials for re-use. Of those who washed and re-used, 99.2% said their re-use material was completely dry before re-use. About 69.7% of the respondents mentioned that they change their menstrual absorbents in sleeping areas at home. About 91% of the respondents reported that the place where they changed their menstrual absorbents was safe, clean, and private. Only 22.5% of women responded to having water and soap at their menstruation management area. Conclusion: The effort for improvements in sanitary techniques during menstruation is partly effective in creating healthy behavior. The current strategy for developing programs to adopt menstrual hygiene measures needs a bottom-up approach with women at the center. Components associated with menstrual hygiene management, such as women's cleanliness, water supply, and the availability and accessibility of disposable sanitary napkins, should be given specific attention. It is essential to acknowledge the issues like toilet construction and behavior change communication to consolidate the gains in an era of "Clean India Mission."

Indexed as

Clean Indiamenstrual hygienesanitationSwachh Bharatwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35495782
PMCPMC9051715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.