Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495718›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Metatranscriptomic Analysis of the Chicken Gut Resistome Response to In-Feed Antibiotics and Natural Feed Additives.

Raju Koorakula, Matteo Schiavinato, Mahdi Ghanbari, Gertrude Wegl, Nikolaus Grabner, Andreas Koestelbauer, Viviana Klose, Juliane C Dohm, Konrad J Domig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raju KoorakulaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Matteo SchiavinatoDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Computational Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Mahdi GhanbariDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Gertrude WeglDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Nikolaus GrabnerDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Andreas KoestelbauerDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Viviana KloseDSM - BIOMIN Research Center, Tulln, Austria.
Juliane C DohmDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Computational Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Konrad J DomigDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Institute of Food Science, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
BOKU University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of resistance against common antibiotics in the gut microbiota is a major issue for both human and livestock health. This highlights the need for understanding the impact of such application on the reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes in poultry gut and devising means to circumvent the potential resistome expansion. Phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) are potential natural alternative to antibiotic to improve animal health and performance, supposedly

Indexed as

antibiotic resistance geneschickengut microbiomemetatranscriptomicsphytogenic feed additivesresistome

Identifiers

PMID35495718
PMCPMC9048739
OpenAlexW4224126868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.