Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Computational Site Saturation Mutagenesis of Canonical and Non-Canonical Amino Acids to Probe Protein-Peptide Interactions.

Jeffrey K Holden, Ryan Pavlovicz, Alberto Gobbi, Yifan Song, Christian N Cunningham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FakeRotLib: Expedient Noncanonical Amino Acid Parametrization in Rosetta.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Building protein structure-specific rotamer libraries.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution.

Jeffrey K HoldenDepartment of Early Discovery Biochemistry, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ryan PavloviczCyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alberto GobbiDepartment of Discovery Chemistry, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Yifan SongCyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Christian N CunninghamDepartment of Early Discovery Biochemistry, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Cyrus Biotechnology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technologies for discovering peptides as potential therapeutics have rapidly advanced in recent years with significant interest from both academic and pharmaceutical labs. These advancements in turn drive the need for new computational tools to design peptides for purposes of advancing lead molecules into the clinic. Here we report the development and application of a new automated tool, AutoRotLib, for parameterizing a diverse set of non-canonical amino acids (NCAAs), N-methyl, or peptoid residues for use with the computational design program Rosetta. In addition, we developed a protocol for designing thioether-cyclized macrocycles within Rosetta, due to their common application in mRNA display using the RaPID platform. To evaluate the utility of these new computational tools, we screened a library of canonical and NCAAs on both a linear peptide and a thioether macrocycle, allowing us to quickly identify mutations that affect peptide binding and subsequently measure our results against previously published data. We anticipate

Indexed as

designmacrocyclenoncanonicalpeptiderosetta

Identifiers

PMID35495632
PMCPMC9047896
OpenAlexW4224125903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.