Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495607›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Potential role for pentoxifylline as an anti-inflammatory drug for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Daniel Miron Brie, Cristian Mornos, Diduta Alina Brie, Constantin Tudor Luca, Lucian Petrescu, Madalina Boruga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Pentoxifylline Prevents Neuroinflammation and Modifies PTEN/TrkB Signaling in an LPS-Induced Depression Model.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Miron BrieDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease Institute Timisoara, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
Cristian MornosDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease Institute Timisoara, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
Diduta Alina BrieDepartment of Cellular Biology, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Constantin Tudor LucaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease Institute Timisoara, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
Lucian PetrescuDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease Institute Timisoara, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
Madalina BorugaDepartment of Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology and Drug Industry, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Institute e-Austria Timisoara · ROVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The link between inflammation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains to be sufficiently elucidated. It has been previously suggested that there is an inflammatory process associated with ACS. Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivate, is known to delay the progression of atherosclerosis and reduce the risk of vascular events, especially by modulating the systemic inflammatory response. The present study is a single-blind, randomized, prospective study of pentoxifylline 400 mg three times a day (TID) added to standard therapy vs. standard therapy plus placebo in ACS patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with ACS were randomized to receive standard therapy plus placebo in one arm (group A; aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, statin) and in the other arm (group B) pentoxifylline 400 mg TID was added to standard therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year. A total of 500 patients underwent randomization (with 250 assigned to group A and 250 to group B) and were followed-up for a median of 20 months. The mean age of the patients was 62.3±10.3 years, 80.4% were male, 20.8% had diabetes, 49.4% had hypertension, and 42% were currently smoking. The statistical analysis was performed for 209 patients in group A and 210 patients in group B (after dropouts due to study drug discontinuation). A primary endpoint occurred in 12.38% (n=26) of patients in group B, as compared with 15.78% (n=33) of those in group A [relative risk (RR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.486-0.1.263; P=0.40], including cardiovascular death (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.80, P=0.84), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.39-3.39, P=0.78), stroke (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.14-6.99, P=0.99) and coronary revascularization (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.015-0.985, P=0.048). Thus, adding pentoxifylline to standard treatment in patients with ACS did not improve MACE at 1 year but had some benefit on the need for coronary revascularization.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeinflammationmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspentoxifyllineprimary outcome

Identifiers

PMID35495607
PMCPMC9019720
OpenAlexW4225312050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.