ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Potential role for pentoxifylline as an anti-inflammatory drug for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of pentoxifylline on serum levels and gene expression of inflammatory markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of interventions targeting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pentoxifylline ameliorates subclinical atherosclerosis progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomized pilot trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Trial
- Pentoxifylline Prevents Neuroinflammation and Modifies PTEN/TrkB Signaling in an LPS-Induced Depression Model.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025Article
- High-Intensity Interval Training Enhances the Positive Effect of Pentoxifylline on Lipid Profile and Inflammatory Markers in an Endometriosis Animal Model.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Effect of pentoxifylline on endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in STEMI patients.Future science OA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The link between inflammation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains to be sufficiently elucidated. It has been previously suggested that there is an inflammatory process associated with ACS. Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivate, is known to delay the progression of atherosclerosis and reduce the risk of vascular events, especially by modulating the systemic inflammatory response. The present study is a single-blind, randomized, prospective study of pentoxifylline 400 mg three times a day (TID) added to standard therapy vs. standard therapy plus placebo in ACS patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with ACS were randomized to receive standard therapy plus placebo in one arm (group A; aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, statin) and in the other arm (group B) pentoxifylline 400 mg TID was added to standard therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year. A total of 500 patients underwent randomization (with 250 assigned to group A and 250 to group B) and were followed-up for a median of 20 months. The mean age of the patients was 62.3±10.3 years, 80.4% were male, 20.8% had diabetes, 49.4% had hypertension, and 42% were currently smoking. The statistical analysis was performed for 209 patients in group A and 210 patients in group B (after dropouts due to study drug discontinuation). A primary endpoint occurred in 12.38% (n=26) of patients in group B, as compared with 15.78% (n=33) of those in group A [relative risk (RR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.486-0.1.263; P=0.40], including cardiovascular death (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.80, P=0.84), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.39-3.39, P=0.78), stroke (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.14-6.99, P=0.99) and coronary revascularization (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.015-0.985, P=0.048). Thus, adding pentoxifylline to standard treatment in patients with ACS did not improve MACE at 1 year but had some benefit on the need for coronary revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.