ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Gender-based differences in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with myocardial infarction from a developing country: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cohort Study of the Effects of Integrated Medical and Nursing Rounds Combined with AIDET Communication Mode on Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- The procedural success of primary angioplasty in a tertiary care center in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- The Gender Spectrum of In-hospital Survival Post Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Exploring Age-driven Trends.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Limited data exists about gender's impact on differences in risk factors and outcomes in our setting. Therefore, we sought to ascertain sex-related differences in patients with AMI in our setting. Material and methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 247 myocardial infarction patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital, between March and October 2020. After hospital admission, all patients underwent ECG, myocardial enzymes, troponin and other biochemical tests followed by primary PCI. Results: Patients were divided in two groups male (n = 153, mean age 55.2 ± 11.0 years) and female (n = 94, mean age 58.4 ± 12.7 years). The prevalence of smoking was higher in males than females (22.8% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.01) and so was history of three-vessel disease (3VD; 18.9% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.013). History of myocardial infarction was lower in females than males (13.8% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.03) however the age did not vary significantly between the two groups (p = 0.21). Serum creatinine (sCr) levels (1.0 ± 0.77 μmol/L vs. 1.2 ± 0.73 μmol/L, p = 0.28) and body mass index (28.4 ± 5.3 vs 27.4 ± 4.8, p = 0.45) were lower in females as compared to males, however not statistically significant. The incidence of major adverse events, severe arrhythmia and in-hospital outcomes showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Post-op TIMI score and average length of hospital stay were not statistically different either (3.29 ± 2.9 vs. 2.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.726). Conclusion: Our study shows that females have a comparable age of onset of major cardiovascular events as that of males. Post-PCI clinical outcomes and in-hospital stay had no significant differences between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.