ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Risk factors for recurrent intussusception after successful reduction in pediatric patients in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal: A prospective study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrent Ileo-Ileal Intussusception in Early Infancy Requiring Surgical Rescue: A Report of a Rare Case.Cureus · 2026Article
- Ileocolic Intussusception in Infancy is not Always Idiopathic - Adenomyoma as the Leading Point.The American journal of case reports · 2023Article
- Factors associated with in-hospital recurrence of intestinal intussusception in children.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intussusception is defined as the invagination of one segment of intestine into another segment of intestine. It may recur because of persistence or return of some factor responsible for the primary intussusception. Various risk factors have been reported but still not well elucidated. Materials and methods: This is the prospective observational study. In this study, 78 patients, age <16 years with diagnosis of intussusception between June 2019 and April 2020 who had successful reduction with either hydrostatic reduction and/or operative reduction in Teaching Hospital were enrolled in the study. This is study of early recurrence as patients were followed up to a period of 1 month for recurrence of intussusception. The recurrent cases were thus identified and various variables were compared between recurrent and non-recurrent cases by univariable and multivariable analysis. Results: Among 78 patients, 13 patients (16.7%) had recurrent intussusception. In the univariable analysis model, the significant risk factors for recurrence of intussusception analyzed were duration of symptoms of 48 h or more, fever, blood in stool and palpable mass. While after multivariable analysis, we found that the significant risk factors for recurrence of intussusception were duration of symptoms ≥48 h (OR = 5.32, p-value = 0.047), Fever (OR = 17.32, p-value = 0.001), palpable mass (OR = 24.12, p-value = 0.017). Conclusion: Attention and awareness among pediatricians about these sonographic and clinical risk factors especially symptoms for recurrence are needed to minimize pre-hospital delay and identify patients in risk of recurrence. This ultimately helps to improve care for pediatric patients with recurrent intussusception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.