Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495095›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2022

Improving needle visibility in LED-based photoacoustic imaging using deep learning with semi-synthetic datasets.

Mengjie Shi, Tianrui Zhao, Simeon J West, Adrien E Desjardins, Tom Vercauteren, Wenfeng Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengjie ShiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Tianrui ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Simeon J WestDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Adrien E DesjardinsWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London W1 W 7TY, United Kingdom.
Tom VercauterenSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Wenfeng XiaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging has shown great potential for guiding minimally invasive procedures by accurate identification of critical tissue targets and invasive medical devices (such as metallic needles). The use of light emitting diodes (LEDs) as the excitation light sources accelerates its clinical translation owing to its high affordability and portability. However, needle visibility in LED-based photoacoustic imaging is compromised primarily due to its low optical fluence. In this work, we propose a deep learning framework based on U-Net to improve the visibility of clinical metallic needles with a LED-based photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system. To address the complexity of capturing ground truth for real data and the poor realism of purely simulated data, this framework included the generation of semi-synthetic training datasets combining both simulated data to represent features from the needles and

Indexed as

Deep learningLight emitting diodesMinimally invasive proceduresNeedle visibilityPhotoacoustic imaging

Identifiers

PMID35495095
PMCPMC9048160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.